Healthcare leadership literature increasingly emphasizes the critical role of defined competencies and domains in cultivating physician leaders equipped to navigate complex clinical, academic, and organizational environments. Previous scholarship has examined physician leadership development frameworks and identified the need for robust competencies spanning interpersonal, cognitive, and strategic domains.(1–5) This manuscript synthesizes findings from a structured review of 51 physician leadership articles with quantitative analysis of AAPL competency assessments to delineate the most- and least-emphasized competencies, domains, and identifiers, reflecting contemporary expectations and critical gaps in physician leadership development.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this initiative was to analyze and synthesize findings from key physician leadership literature alongside empirical competency assessment data to 1) recognize the most-frequently and least-frequently researched American Association for Physician Leadership (AAPL) competencies and domains, while 2) identifying novel competencies suggested in newer literature deemed most critical by physicians for effective leadership in healthcare organizations. This analysis aims to inform targeted leadership development efforts by clarifying the specific skills and attributes physicians are actively seeking in their leaders to promote organizational excellence, adaptability, and team-based success.
METHODS
Study Design
This study followed a structured article review using an integrative content analysis methodology to identify and rank physician leadership competencies and domains, supplemented by quantitative analysis of AAPL competency assessment data totaling 463 points across 36 competencies within nine domains. To ensure contemporaneity and capture the evolving nature of physician leadership, additional articles were also analyzed to identify novel competencies that have emerged since the original framework was established. Because of the integration of artificial intelligence in the review design, the PRISMA guidelines were largely followed; however, full adherence to the traditional systematic review format was not feasible. This approach allowed the study to both reaffirm established competencies and incorporate progressive elements reflective of current leadership demands in healthcare.
Data Sources and Search Strategy
Our structured review comprised three steps: 1) Leveraging a pre-existing dataset comprising physician assessments of seminal and contemporary leadership literature, a constructed dataset from peer-reviewed articles focused on physician leadership competencies and development, and artificial intelligence platforms (ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity) were used to cross-reference the analysis of data. 2) Three artificial intelligence platforms (ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity) were utilized to generate parallel analyses. 3) These parallel analyses were subsequently reviewed and validated by human investigators against a human analysis to mitigate the risks of mistakes and fabrications commonly called hallucinations, and to ensure interpretative accuracy.
Data Extraction and Analysis
Three physician reviewers (ND, AS, DZ) independently extracted and categorized competencies and domains referenced across the literature. Frequencies of occurrence were quantified alongside empirical AAPL competency scores, enabling the generation of ranked lists that distinguished the most- and least-emphasized competencies and domains. Any discrepancies in extraction or categorization were resolved through consensus discussions among the reviewers. The synthesis aligned with existing frameworks established by AAPL and other recognized authorities in healthcare leadership literature.
Scoring Methodology
Each competency received a score equal to the number of articles (out of 51 total) in which it was referenced. This raw score was then converted to a percentage to indicate the proportion of literature addressing that competency. For example, if a competency was referenced in 24 of the 51 articles, its score was a 24, representing 47% of the reviewed literature. This approach provides a clear indication of which competencies are most emphasized in current physician leadership research and which require greater scholarly attention.
Quality Assessment
Articles included in the analysis were evaluated for relevance, methodological rigor, and alignment with established leadership competency frameworks. Studies were assessed for quality based on clarity of definitions, robustness of methods, and relevance to physician leadership contexts. This ensured that only high-quality, pertinent literature informed the final synthesis. The resultant findings underwent an additional layer of validation through a structured review by a 12-member panel whose collective insights further strengthened the interpretive accuracy, rigor, and credibility of the analysis.
RESULTS
Findings from Empirical AAPL Competency Assessment
Drawing upon quantitative analysis of AAPL competency assessments totaling 463 points across 36 competencies and nine domains, combined with insights from a comprehensive literature review and the experiences of senior physician leaders, the following sections highlight the competencies, domains, and identifiers that empirical evidence and physician leaders identify as essential or critically lacking in leadership practice.
AAPL-Identified Three Most-Frequently Researched Competencies (Table 1)
Collaborative Function (47% of articles)
Collaborative function emerges as the most frequently researched competency, appearing in nearly half (24 of 51) of the reviewed articles. This reflects the literature’s strong emphasis on physicians’ recognition that healthcare delivery fundamentally depends on seamless interdisciplinary coordination. This competency encompasses the ability to work effectively across professional boundaries, facilitate team-based decision-making, and create synergistic relationships that enhance patient outcomes.(6,7) The high score aligns with literature emphasizing that effective healthcare leaders must transcend traditional hierarchical models to foster truly collaborative environments.(8)
Motivate Others (45% of articles)
The capacity to motivate others ranks as the second-most frequently researched competency, appearing in 23 of 51 articles. This competency reflects the critical need for leaders who can maintain team engagement and resilience, particularly during periods of organizational stress, burnout, and systemic challenges prevalent in contemporary healthcare.(3,9) Effective motivational leadership aligns team efforts with organizational mission while supporting individual professional fulfillment.(5)
Quality Improvement (43% of articles)
Quality improvement represents the third most-frequently researched competency, appearing in 22 of 51 articles, demonstrating the enduring centrality of clinical excellence in physician leadership. This competency reflects leaders’ responsibility to drive systematic improvements in patient care delivery, safety protocols, and outcome measurement. The high score indicates that physician leaders must maintain clinical credibility while advancing organizational quality initiatives, bridging the gap between clinical practice and administrative leadership.
AAPL-Identified Three Least-Frequently Researched Competencies (Table 1)
Payment Models (2% of articles)
Payment models represents the most critical competency gap, with the lowest individual score reflecting widespread physician leader unfamiliarity with healthcare financing mechanisms. This deficit is particularly concerning given the increasing complexity of value-based care, accountable care organizations, and alternative payment structures that define contemporary healthcare economics.(10) The extremely low score suggests that leadership development must prioritize healthcare finance education to enable effective strategic decision-making.
Differentiation (4% of articles)
Strategic differentiation emerges as the second-lowest competency, indicating physician leaders’ struggle to position their organizations competitively within evolving healthcare markets. This gap reflects the challenge of transitioning from clinical to strategic thinking, where leaders must identify unique value propositions and competitive advantages.(7) The low score suggests that physician leaders require enhanced strategic marketing and positioning capabilities.
Health Law (4% of articles)
Health law competency ranks third lowest, revealing a critical knowledge gap in regulatory compliance, risk management, and legal frameworks governing healthcare delivery. This deficit is particularly problematic given the increasing regulatory complexity and legal liability concerns facing healthcare organizations.(3) The low score indicates that physician leaders need comprehensive legal literacy to navigate compliance requirements and mitigate organizational risk.
AAPL-Identified Three Most-Frequently Researched Domains (Table 2)
Team Building and Teamwork (39% of articles)
Team building and teamwork emerge as the highest-performing domain. This domain encompasses collaborative function [24], team building [19], relationship development [18], and working through others [18]. The exceptional performance reflects physicians’ recognition that healthcare delivery is fundamentally collaborative, requiring leaders who can build trust, facilitate communication, and create psychologically safe environments for multidisciplinary teams.(2,6)
Problem Solving (27% of articles) and Motivations and Thinking Style (27% of articles)
These domains tie for second place, each demonstrating above-average performance while revealing specific strengths and gaps. Problem-solving shows strength in action orientation [19] and strategic perspective [18], but weakness in critical appraisal skills [8]. Motivations and thinking style excels in motivating others [23] and adaptability [19] but shows a critical deficiency in comfort with visibility [3]. These patterns suggest that physician leaders possess analytical and motivational capabilities but struggle with leadership presence, and detailed analytical processes.(9,11)
AAPL-Identified Three Least-Frequently Researched Domains
Finance (14% of articles)
Finance represents the most critical domain deficiency, with all four competencies scoring well below average: financial management [11], resource allocation [10], economics [6], and payment models [1]. This comprehensive gap reflects physician leaders’ inadequate preparation for the business aspects of healthcare leadership, which is particularly concerning given the increasing emphasis on financial stewardship and value-based care.(10) The consistently low scores across all financial competencies indicate the need for comprehensive business education in physician leadership development.
Quality and Risk (17% of articles)
Despite containing the high-scoring quality improvement competency [22], this domain shows significant gaps in risk management [3] and health law [2], creating an unbalanced profile. While physician leaders demonstrate commitment to clinical quality, they lack essential capabilities in organizational risk assessment and legal compliance.(3) This pattern suggests that quality-focused physicians need enhanced training in regulatory and risk management frameworks.
Self-Management (19% of articles)
Self-management shows a paradoxical pattern with high self-awareness [19] but critically low resilience [5] and modest self-control [9]. This profile suggests that physician leaders possess insight into their capabilities and limitations but lack effective coping strategies for stress management and emotional regulation.(4) The gap between awareness and resilience indicates that leadership development must address both cognitive and emotional competencies.
Novel Competencies: Three Most-Frequently Researched Identifiers
Demonstrates Systems Awareness
Systems awareness emerges as a critical competency for physician leaders who must navigate complex organizational interdependencies while maintaining clinical focus. This competency enables leaders to understand how departmental decisions impact broader organizational outcomes and to align clinical initiatives with strategic objectives.(12) Physicians value leaders who can transcend clinical silos to optimize organizational performance.
This competency, however, introduces temporal constraints for physician leaders — particularly those newly integrated into an institution — as meaningful proficiency requires sufficient time to develop system familiarity, contextual understanding, and experiential insight necessary for effective performance. In the absence of this foundational knowledge, leaders may be compelled to rely primarily on prior experience to navigate the new environment, which may not fully align with the institution’s structures, culture, or operational dynamics.
Cultivates Innovation
Innovation cultivation represents another essential identifier, reflecting the need for leaders who can foster creative problem-solving and support experimentation within clinical environments. This competency enables organizations to adapt to technological advances, regulatory changes, and evolving patient expectations.(8,11) Physicians seek leaders who encourage calculated risk-taking and support innovative clinical practices.
Demonstrates Leadership Presence
Leadership presence, encompassing comfort with visibility and professional gravitas, emerges as a critical gap requiring immediate attention. The extremely low score for comfort with visibility [3] indicates that physician leaders struggle with the public-facing aspects of senior leadership roles. This competency is essential for stakeholder engagement, board presentations, and external relationship management.(10)
This term was revised from the original “executive presence” to “leadership presence” in response to reviewer panel feedback, which noted that the former is often associated with traditionally male-centric and autocratic leadership paradigms. The updated terminology aims to foster a more contemporary and collaborative understanding of effective leadership.
Novel Competencies: Least-Frequently Researched Lowest Three Identifiers
Navigates Financial Complexity
Financial navigation capabilities represent the most critical gap, encompassing understanding of payment models, revenue cycle management, and healthcare economics. This identifier reflects the comprehensive nature of financial illiteracy among physician leaders, requiring systematic business education to enable effective resource stewardship.(3)
Manages Regulatory Compliance
Regulatory compliance management emerges as another critical deficiency, reflecting physician leaders’ inadequate preparation for navigating healthcare law, risk management, and compliance frameworks. This gap creates significant organizational vulnerability and limits leaders’ effectiveness in strategic planning.(10)
Builds Organizational Resilience
Building organizational resilience, which encompasses both personal and team resilience, represents a fundamental leadership gap. The low resilience score [5] combined with modest self-control [9] suggests that physician leaders lack the emotional intelligence and stress management capabilities necessary for sustainable leadership performance.(4,9)
LIMITATIONS AND FUTURE RESEARCH
While this analysis provides valuable empirical insights into physician leadership competencies, it is not without limitations. The dataset, though derived from thorough physician assessments and AAPL competency scoring, reflects the experiences of a specific cohort and may not capture the full spectrum of competencies emphasized across all health systems or cultural contexts. Additionally, the reliance on frequency counts and competency scores does not capture the depth or context of each competency’s application within diverse healthcare environments.
While the PRISMA guidelines informed the methodological framework, deviations arose because of the hybrid AI-human approach and the reliance on a curated dataset. Thus, a traditional systematic review was not possible. These adaptations may limit reproducibility but enhance the efficiency, scalability, and breadth of the review (Table 2).
Future research should seek to validate these findings through broader surveys incorporating diverse healthcare settings and perspectives. Longitudinal studies examining the impact of targeted competency-based leadership training on organizational outcomes, including patient safety, financial performance, and staff retention, would further substantiate the value of these competencies.
Additionally, research examining the effectiveness of specific interventions addressing the identified gaps in financial literacy, regulatory compliance, and leadership presence would provide actionable guidance for leadership development programs.
CONCLUSION
This empirical analysis of physician leadership competencies reveals a complex profile of strengths and critical gaps that must inform future leadership development initiatives. The data demonstrate exceptional capability in collaborative function, motivational leadership, and quality improvement, while revealing comprehensive deficiencies in financial acumen, regulatory compliance, and leadership presence. The 64.3% overall competency achievement rate (463 possible points) indicates substantial room for improvement across all domains.
The findings suggest that effective physician leadership development must adopt a dual approach: leveraging existing strengths in team building and quality improvement while systematically addressing gaps in business literacy and leadership presence. The critical gaps in payment models, differentiation, and health law require further attention through comprehensive business education programs.
Organizations seeking to develop physician leaders should prioritize financial literacy training, regulatory compliance education, and leadership presence coaching while building upon demonstrated strengths in collaborative leadership and quality improvement.
These developmental priorities were strongly reinforced during the review panel’s deliberations, wherein members emphasized that effective physician leadership requires intentional preparation that extends beyond clinical expertise. The panel noted that navigating the complexities of inter-professional collaboration, healthcare operations, and organizational strategy demands structured coaching, targeted mentorship, and a deliberate commitment to cultivating business and systems leadership competencies.
This perspective underscored a shared recognition that health systems bear a professional and ethical responsibility to equip emerging physician leaders with the knowledge, skills, and experiential grounding necessary to lead effectively in today’s multifaceted healthcare environment.
The data provide a clear roadmap for evidence-based leadership development that addresses both traditional clinical leadership competencies and emerging business leadership requirements essential for success in contemporary and evolving healthcare environments (Table 3).
References
Angood P. Physician Leadership Is Needed Now More Than Ever. Medical Economics. December 13, 2022. https://www.medicaleconomics.com/view/physician-leadership-is-needed-now-more-than-ever .
Herbert C. Perspectives in Primary Care: Values-Driven Leadership Is Essential in Health Care. Ann Fam Med. 2015;13(6):573–575. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1877 .
Kaiser F, Schmid A, Schlüchtermann J. Physician-Leaders and Hospital Performance Revisited. Soc Sci Med. 2020;249:112831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112831 .
Kiesewetter J, Schmidt-Huber M, Netzel, Krohn AC, et al. Training of Leadership Skills in Medical Education. GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2013;30(4):Doc49.
Lin MY, Weng WS, Apriliyasari RW, Truong PV, Tsai PS. Effects of Patient Activation Intervention on Chronic Diseases: A Meta-Analysis. J Nurs Res. 2020;28(5):e116. https://doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000387 .
Lucas R, Goldman EF, Scott AR, Dandar V. Leadership Development Programs at Academic Health Centers: Results of a National Survey. Acad Med. 2018;93(2):229–236. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001813 .
McCarthy D, Mueller K, Wrenn J. Mayo Clinic: Multidisciplinary Teamwork, Physician-Led Governance, and Patient-Centered Culture Drive World-Class Health Care. Commonwealth Fund. August 2009;27:1–16. https://collections.nlm.nih.gov/catalog/nlm:nlmuid-101537958-pdf .
Lyons O, George R, Galante JR, et al. Evidence-Based Medical Leadership Development: A Systematic Review. BMJ Leader. 2021;5:206–213. https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2020-000360 .
Howard J, Shaw EF, Felsen CB, Crabtree BF. Physicians as Inclusive Leaders: Insights from a Participatory Quality Improvement Intervention. Qual Manag Health Care. 2012;21(3):135–145. https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0b013e31825e876a .
Birk S. Creating a Culture Of ‘We’: Investing in Physician Leaders. Healthcare Executive. 2014;29(1):11–18.
Laothamatas I, Nash DB. The Current State of Physician Leadership Training. HMPI Health Manag Policy Innov. 2019;4(1):1–8. https://hmpi.org/2019/09/08/the-current-state-of-physician-leadership-training/ .
Shanafelt TD, Noseworthy JH. Executive Leadership and Physician Well-Being: Nine Organizational Strategies to Promote Engagement and Reduce Burnout. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92(1):129–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.10.004 .
Additional Resources
Al-Nami AQ, Khan LA. Physician’s Leadership Role in Healthcare Transformation — Challenges and Opportunities. Saudi J Med. 2023;8(9): 547–549. https://doi.org/10.36348/sjm.2023.v08i09.013 .
Ariss B, Bolden R, Bigland C, Evans D, Rae M. Systems Leadership in Practice: Thematic Insights from Three Public Health Case Studies. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:1735. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09641-1 .
Bailey-Wheaton J, Zigrang TA. Hospital CEO Searches Increasingly Seeking Physicians. Health Capital Topics. August 2019;12(8).
Belasen A, Belasen A, Feng Z. The Physician CEO Advantage and Hospital Performance During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Capacity Utilization and Patient Satisfaction. J Health Organ Manag. 2023;37(3):313–326. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-04-2022-0126 .
Bornman J, Louw B. Leadership Development Strategies in Interprofessional Healthcare Collaboration: A Rapid Review. J Healthc Leadersh. 2023;15:175–192. https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S405983 .
Byrnes J. The Value of Physician Leaders. J Hosp Med. 2015;10(4):251–255. https://doi.org/10.1097/00115514-201607000-00003 .
Cleary M, Kornhaber R, Kaji D, West S, Visentin D. A Systematic Review of Behavioral Outcomes for Leadership Interventions Among Health Professionals. J Nurs Res. 2020;28(5):e118. https://doi.org/10.1097/JNR.0000000000000397 .
Debets M, Jansen I, Lombarts K, Kuijer-Siebelink W, Kruijthof K, et al. Linking Leadership Development Programs for Physicians with Organization-Level Outcomes: A Realist Review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23:783. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09811-y .
Drew JR, Pandit M. Why Healthcare Leadership Should Embrace Quality Improvement. BMJ. 2020;368:m872. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m872 .
Flaig J, Alam A, Huynh J, Reid-Hector J, Heuer A. Examining How Formal Leadership Development Programs Positively Influence Hospital Leaders’ Individual Competencies and Organizational Outcomes — An Evidence-Based Literature Review. J Healthc Leadersh. 2020;12:69-83. https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S239676 .
Frich JC, Brewster AL, Cherlin EJ, Bradley EH. Leadership Development Programs for Physicians: A Systematic Review. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(5):656–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-3141-1 .
Garman AN, Standish MP, Wainio JA. Bridging Worldviews: Toward a Common Model of Leadership Across the Health Professions. Health Care Manage Rev. 2020;45(4):E45–E55. https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000243 .
Geerts JM, Goodall AH, Agius S. Evidence-Based Leadership Development for Physicians: A Systematic Literature Review. Soc Sci Med. 2020;246:112709. 2019.112709.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112709 .
Goodall AH, Stoller JK. The Future of Clinical Leadership: Evidence for Physician Leadership and the Educational Pathway for New Leaders. BMJ Leader. 2017;1:8–11. https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2017-000010 .
Huikko-Tarvainen S. Elements of Perceived Good Physician Leadership and Their Relation to Leadership Theory. Leadersh Health Serv. 2022;33(1):14–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/lhs-01-2021-0002 .
Keluth SA, Bendriss R. Leadership Curriculum in Medical Education: Exploring Student and Faculty Perceptions in a US Medical School in Qatar. J Healthc Leadersh. 2022;14:163–173. https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S370645 .
Mintz LJ, Stoller JK. A Systematic Review of Physician Leadership and Emotional Intelligence. J Grad Med Educ. 2014;6(1):21–31. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-13-00012.1 .
Mountford J, Webb C. When Clinicians Lead. McKinsey Q. February 2009. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/healthcare/our-insights/when-clinicians-lead .
Muhlestein D, Tu T, Colla CH. Accountable Care Organizations Are Increasingly Led by Physician Groups Rather Than Hospital Systems. Am J Manag Care. 2020;26(5):225–228. https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2020.43154 .
Mustafa S, Stoller JK, Bierer SB, Farver CF. Effectiveness of a Leadership Development Course for Chief Residents: A Longitudinal Evaluation. J Grad Med Educ. 2020;12(2):193–202. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-19-00542.1 .
Reinertsen JL. Physicians as Leaders in the Improvement of Health Care Systems. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128(10):833-838. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-128-10-199805150-00007 .
Sarto F, Veronesi G. Clinical Leadership and Hospital Performance: Assessing the Evidence Base. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(Suppl 2):169. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1395-5 .
Satiani B, Prakash S. It Is Time for More Physician and Nursing Representation on Hospital Boards in the US. J Hosp Med Manag. 2016;1:2. https://doi.org/10.4172/2471-9781.100011 .
Satiani B, Sena J, Ruberg R, Ellison EC. Talent Management and Physician Leadership Training Is Essential for Preparing Tomorrow’s Physician Leaders. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59(2):542–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.074 .
Sebastian IA, Gandhi DBC, Kakarla R, Phillips A. Developing a Second Line of Physician Leaders. Stroke. 2023;54(10):e444-e447. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.040864 .
Seidman G, Pascal L, McDonough J. What Benefits Do Healthcare Organisations Receive from Leadership and Management Development Programmes? A Systematic Review of the Evidence. BMJ Leader. 2020;4:21–36. https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2019-000141 .
Smith T, Fowler-Davis S, Nancarrow S, Ariss B, Enderby P. Leadership in Interprofessional Health and Social Care Teams: A Literature Review. Leadersh Health Serv. 2018;31(4):452–467. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHS-06-2016-0026 .
Stoller JK. Developing Physician-Leaders: A Call to Action. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(7):876–878. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1007-8 .
Stoller JK. Leadership Essentials for CHEST Medicine Professionals: Models, Attributes, Styles. Chest. 2021;159(3):1147–1154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.09.095 .
Tasi MC, Keswani A, Bozic KJ. Does Physician Leadership Affect Hospital Quality, Operational Efficiency, and Financial Performance? Health Care Manage Rev. 2019;44(3):256–262. https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000173 .
Thoebes GP, Porter TH, Peck JA. Physicians as Leaders: A Systematic Review Through the Lens of Expert Leadership. Leadersh Health Serv. 2023;36(4):590-607. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMPROC .2023.11159abstract.
Torti JMI, Inayat H, Inayat A, Lingard L, Haddara W, Sultan N. Perspectives on Physician Leadership: The Role of Character-Based Leadership in Medicine. Med Educ. 2022;56(12):1184–1193. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14875 .
Tuso PJ. The Physician as Leader. Perm J. 2003;7(1):81–83. https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/03.985 .
Ulrich R, Joseph A, Quan X, Zhu X, et al. A Review of the Research Literature on Evidence-Based Healthcare Design. Health Environ Res Des J. 2008;1(3):61–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/193758670800100306 .
van Diggele C, Burgess A, Roberts C, Mellis C. Leadership in Healthcare Education. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(Suppl 2):456. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02288-x .
Vo A, Torti J, Haddara W, Sultan N. Exploring Medical Students’ Perspectives of Physician Leadership. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03971-x .
Wolk SW. The Need for Physician Leaders. HCA Healthc J Med. 2021;2(1):1–4. https://doi.org/10.36518/2689-0216.1242 .
Wynia M, Bedzow I. Values-Based Leadership During the Transformation of Health Care. SHRM Executive Network. Accessed October 12, 2025. https://www.shrm.org/executive-network/insights/people-strategy/values-based-leadership-transformation-health-care .